Support eBeefs! Support Free Media!

Order your copy of the explosive documentary, The President's Pressmen, on rights abuses and media repression in Sierra Leone, out now on DVD.

By getting your copy today, you will also be contributing to post production costs for The Hijacking of Libya, our latest film on the imperialist assault against Libya.

Just click on the paypal button on the right.

Early Beefs

Support Free Media!   Get your copy of The President's Pressmen

 

Support eBeefs and get something back!

Subscribe
« Is editor of The Independent too close to Rupert Murdoch? | Main | On America's Wars »
Friday
Jul152011

What's in a name?

By J L Samboma

It is a phenomenon of enduring wonderment to me that to be called a Marxist these days is almost the equivalent of someone saying you're a wife-beater; whereas to be called a communist - which is but the same thing - is to be reserved the same esteem as befits a pederast.

This is all the more remarkable when you consider that the Marxist, or communist, ideal, is the most humane political ideology one has had the great fortune to encounter in this as-yet brief sojourn on earth. What could be more intuitive than to want to end oppression, man's inhumanity to man, to want to share the wealth created by the people for the benefit of the people?

Is it our fault, or a consequence of our active collaboration, that men -  for it's mostly men - who claimed to be Marxists, or communists, happened to have committed some of the most atrocious acts ever recorded in human history?

Do the self-righteous folk who point fingers and use the words "Marxist" and "communism" as if they were spit-fire missiles, shun from calling themselves believers in the so-called "free market," or from hailing Ray-Gun of America, the Abominable Bush-man or, more recently, the blacks seduced by Mr Obomber - ever think that their heros' hands are as bloody as any so-called communist?

Come to think of it, some of the worst atrocities you could think of have been committed by so-called religious people - Muslims, Christians, Jews, the list is endless. But religion, perhaps paradoxically, is boom-business.

No, we are not going to be cowed from proclaiming who we are and what we believe in. We are Marxist and, alas, we are, yes, communist.

And, last but not least by any means, we are Pan-Africanist, whose ideal is the unification of Africa under a socialist government of African states. The Osagyefo (Redeemer) Kwame Nkrumah (pictured right) wished it and worked, and died, for it - and it is the sacred duty of successive generations of African descendants to strive for its realisation.

 

Reader Comments (3)

Great entry, Julian! Glad to have found your blog.
July 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTed
I seek truth and don't need a label to identify myself.This society identifies me as Black end of argument i rest my case,see history !
July 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRernaldo Ricketts
Hi Ted,

Thanks for stopping by - and for you kind words. I'll be a Marxist until my soul-patch turns grey, and beyond. There have been a few responses to this short piece.

However, since my response is rather long, I have posted it as an independent item, http://www.ebeefs.com/beefs/communism-is-not-a-swear-word-in-my-lexicon.html .

Cheers,

J L Samboma
July 20, 2011 | Registered CommenterEditor

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.